Delivered-To: ennael1@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.82.164 with SMTP id j4csp85243oay; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.24.35 with SMTP id r3mr23804817wif.7.1337032148401; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from alamut.mageia.org (alamut.mageia.org. [212.85.158.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w2si20559757wew.44.2012.05.14.14.49.07; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.85.158.146; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org designates 212.85.158.146 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org; dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 8C2B544636; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:49:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA6344636 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:49:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mageia.org Authentication-Results: alamut.mageia.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass header.i=@googlemail.com Received: from alamut.mageia.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alamut.mageia.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id co4joCthNBWW for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:49:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) by alamut.mageia.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D6F44443 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 23:49:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by werc12 with SMTP id c12so2487628wer.22 for ; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:49:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zIuW+A9xjA/5Dz2ddpPgb4PNit82Kei8sXh52C9PkHQ=; b=BcHfsrlit/UujTRWSQOYCS6HPBwCUENY3iwRi2BXD/45+BqLGdnZGuQXbxKYpSCNpu mQrKw+evr2AWLd7GrrRb/CrVHVwhmNWrrHkWSXC+Mo+cCmlIagLFrH5tS4asAFjrcmpi eQwqDijf6FkRuC7yMKyBmWvrEzZbOnXJBBKBGX2RL0Yz0ou29BVqKcE/mKxKSBwziV9N thmrexAsPkRTwUZXaXkcplH1K+TPS9LRnq6HpOU3smEzSWTkeyWSzhkd1oH18U2Mr8XS 58zuDL70zQHX282S6pX9V1JtG2suGMfoEVkvC9W5r754F0WdKmfRs5gS/YGmqAS85jsI MdOw== Received: by 10.180.105.194 with SMTP id go2mr1912221wib.22.1337032141174; Mon, 14 May 2012 14:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beteigeuze.oli-home (p5B1410D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.20.16.216]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j4sm59111707wix.5.2012.05.14.14.48.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 May 2012 14:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FB17DC9.8030509@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 23:48:57 +0200 From: Oliver Burger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120426 Thunderbird/10.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nicolas vigier CC: board-private@ml.mageia.org References: <4FB16CC3.7020309@gmail.com> <4FB16DF6.2050001@googlemail.com> <4FB16E9C.7020903@gmail.com> <4FB17214.7010501@googlemail.com> <20120514212033.GE21938@mars-attacks.org> In-Reply-To: <20120514212033.GE21938@mars-attacks.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [board-private] News from Mandriva X-Loop: board-private@ml.mageia.org X-Sequence: 32 Errors-to: board-private-owner@ml.mageia.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: board-private-request@ml.mageia.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Am 14.05.2012 23:20, schrieb nicolas vigier: > Yes I think it should be clear that Mageia doesn't do anything special > for Mandriva, which is treated like any other contributor, and is > independant. Maybe we can prepare a blog post to publish after the > announce from Mandriva to remind this and avoid possible misunderstandings ? Good idea, I would also like to be able to answer questions. As I know the chief editor of LinuxUser (print magazine, part of Linux New Media, one of the biggest publishers here in Germany, I might find myself interviewed by him. > > And reason for keeping this private is that it was requested by them, > and as Mageia is not taking any decision or doing something special > about this, I think there is no reason to refuse to keep this info > private for now. Yes, completely d'accord. Oliver